California Injury LawExplained.Talk to GJEL
Insurance Guide

What if the driver who hit me has no insurance?

ATTORNEY REVIEWED

Reviewed by Andrew (Andy) R. Gillin

California State Bar #45226 ↗ · Approval recorded November 4, 2026

How we record review approval
THE SHORT ANSWER

Your own uninsured motorist coverage may help. This is coverage for some harm caused by a driver with no insurance. You must have the coverage and meet its rules.

Sources: [1][2]
In this guide

Here’s an example

IMAGINE THIS

A driver who has this coverage gets hit by an uninsured driver. They report the crash to their own insurer.

A made-up example to explain the idea. Your facts may lead to a different answer.

How the rule works

This type of claim is often made to your own insurer. You still need to show that the other driver was at fault and that the policy applies. Coverage does not remove the need for proof.

Legal references: [1] Insurance Code § 11580.2 — Uninsured motorist coverage · [2] California Department of Insurance — Automobile insurance guide

SEE HOW IT FITS

Three coverages, different jobs

  1. Liability

    May pay for harm you cause to other people.

  2. Uninsured motorist

    May help when the at-fault driver has no insurance.

  3. Underinsured motorist

    May help when the at-fault driver has too little.

Read the actual policy. These labels explain different purposes, not a promise of coverage.

Start with your own coverage

Look for uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage, often called UM. It is different from liability coverage. Liability usually pays for harm you cause to others. UM may help with harm caused by an uninsured driver.

Do not rely on the words “full coverage.” Read the coverage list and the policy. Check who is insured, which event is covered, the limits, and any steps needed to make a claim.

Sources: [1][2]

Coverage and fault are separate questions

Your own insurer may still ask for proof of fault, injury, and loss. Save photos, witness details, and care records. A policy does not turn every crash into an automatic payment.

A dispute about who is covered can differ from a dispute about fault or the amount of harm. Bouton explains that distinction. Ask which issue is in dispute before choosing the next step.

Sources: [1][3]

What can change the answer?

Payment is not automatic. Notice, proof, policy limits, and time limits matter. Other parties may also share fault.

Questions people ask

Is uninsured motorist coverage required in California?

Insurers must offer the coverage under state law. A named insured can reject it in a signed writing that meets the law’s rules. Check the policy and any rejection form. Do not assume it was included.

References: [1][2]

What if the other driver had a small policy?

That may be an underinsured motorist issue rather than an uninsured one. The rules and steps are not all the same. Check your own policy before signing a release.

References: [1][4]

THE CASE LAW

Court decisions behind this answer

A case can help explain a rule. Its facts and limits matter too.

Bouton v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of California · 2008
43 Cal.4th 1190, pp. 1193–1202

Some coverage questions belong in court. They differ from the fault and money issues a policy sends to arbitration.

What to keep in mind

This does not prove that a given person is covered. The policy, law, and kind of dispute matter.

Case applicability reviewed as recorded above.

A useful next step

Check your policy and coverage summary. Tell your insurer about the crash. Ask what steps are due and when.

If you are unsure which rule applies, a lawyer can review your facts and any deadlines. Learn about GJEL’s injury representation.

CHECK THE SOURCE

The law behind this guide

The references below support the legal discussion. Their application depends on the facts.

  1. Insurance Code § 11580.2 — Uninsured motorist coverage ↗Statute · Review recorded above
  2. California Department of Insurance — Automobile insurance guide ↗Agency guidance · Review recorded above
  3. Bouton v. USAA Casualty Ins. Co. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1190 ↗Case law · Review recorded above
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Macri (1992) 4 Cal.4th 318 ↗Case law · Review recorded above

Updated 2026-11-04. Read our editorial standards.

This is general information, not legal advice. It does not decide whether you have a claim. Important exceptions and deadlines may apply.
WHEN YOU NEED A PERSON, NOT ANOTHER PAGE

Your situation deserves
a closer look.

A guide can explain a rule. A lawyer can help you understand how it may apply to you.

Ask GJEL about your situation