# What if someone’s dog bit me?

Canonical: https://californiapersonalinjurylaws.com/guides/dog-bite/

Reviewed by Andrew (Andy) R. Gillin; publisher reported approval on 2026-11-04. Original review date was not supplied.

## Short answer

A dog owner may have to pay for a bite even if the dog never bit anyone before. The state’s dog-bite law has rules about where and how the bite happened.

## Hypothetical example

A dog bites a guest who has a right to be in the owner’s yard.

## How the rule works

Civil Code § 3342 generally addresses bites in public places or while a person is lawfully in a private place. It contains specific conditions and exceptions.

## Four facts to check after a dog injury

1. **Owner**: Who owned the dog?
2. **Bite**: Was there a bite or another type of injury?
3. **Place and role**: Where were you, and what were you doing?
4. **Harm and proof**: What injury and losses can the records show?

These are research questions, not a finding of fault. Other claims and exceptions may matter.

## Does the dog need a history of biting?

The bite statute can apply even if the owner did not know the dog could bite. It generally concerns an owner’s dog biting a person in a public place or while that person is lawfully in a private place.

That does not mean every dog injury fits this statute. Check who owned the dog, whether a bite occurred, where it happened, and the circumstances. A fall caused by a dog can raise different rules.


If a dog knocked you down, compare [a dog injury without a bite](https://californiapersonalinjurylaws.com/guides/dog-knocked-me-down/).


Sources: [Civil Code § 3342 — Dog bite liability](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3342.); [Davis v. Gaschler (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 1392](https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2284211/davis-v-gaschler/)

## What should I keep after a bite?

Get needed care from a health professional. Save the owner’s contact details, photos, witness names, and any report. Keep a record of bills and missed work. These records serve different parts of the claim.

Your role around the dog can matter. Priebe involved a kennel worker and work-related risks. It is not a general rule that blocks all people who interact with dogs from making a claim.


Do not let a coverage discussion replace checking [injury lawsuit time limits](https://californiapersonalinjurylaws.com/guides/injury-lawsuit-deadline/).

When the person bitten is a child, check [time limits for an injured child](https://californiapersonalinjurylaws.com/guides/child-injury-deadline/).


Sources: [Civil Code § 3342 — Dog bite liability](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3342.); [Priebe v. Nelson (2006) 39 Cal.4th 1112](https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2006/s126412.html); [Civil Code § 3333 — Compensation for harm](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3333.)

## What can change the answer

You must check who owned the dog and whether you had a right to be there. Defenses and special exceptions can change the answer.

## A useful next step

Get medical care as needed. Find out who owns the dog. Save photos and the names of people who saw the bite.

## What if the dog had never bitten anyone before?

A prior bite is not required for the owner’s liability under the bite statute when its conditions are met. Other facts and exceptions still need review.

## What if an insurer calls before I know my losses?

Keep the claim details and ask what the offer covers. A release can give up claims even if some effects are not yet clear. Review it with the facts and any deadlines.

## Court decisions behind this answer

### Davis v. Gaschler (1992)

11 Cal.App.4th 1392, pp. 1397–1399. The owners argued that the person accepted the risk. The court rejected that as a complete defense on the facts before it.

Limit: Later cases recognize some special defenses. Check the setting and current dog-bite law.

Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2284211/davis-v-gaschler/

### Priebe v. Nelson (2006)

39 Cal.4th 1112, slip op., pp. 1–4. The court barred the kennel worker’s claim under the dog-bite law in that setting. That claim involved a risk of caring for the dog.

Limit: This is a rule for a special work setting. It does not defeat every claim after a dog bite.

Source: https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2006/s126412.html

## Sources

- [Civil Code § 3342 — Dog bite liability](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3342.)
- [Davis v. Gaschler (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 1392](https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2284211/davis-v-gaschler/)
- [Priebe v. Nelson (2006) 39 Cal.4th 1112](https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2006/s126412.html)
- [Civil Code § 1542 — General releases and unknown claims](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1542.)
- [Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1 — Injury and death actions](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP&sectionNum=335.1.)
- [Civil Code § 3333 — Compensation for harm](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3333.)

General information, not legal advice.
