California Injury LawExplained.Talk to GJEL
Court decision

Priebe v. Nelson

Supreme Court of California · 2006
39 Cal.4th 1112, slip op., pp. 1–4

ATTORNEY REVIEWED

Reviewed by Andrew (Andy) R. Gillin

California State Bar #45226 ↗ · Approval recorded November 4, 2026

How we record review approval

What brought the case to court?

A worker at a kennel was bitten by a dog boarded there. She sought to hold the dog’s owner liable under the dog-bite statute.

The question before the court

How did the worker’s job and its risks affect her statutory bite claim?

What the court decided

The court applied the work-risk rule to that statutory claim. It also explained that other claims involving a known dangerous trait could raise different issues.

Where the rule has limits

This is a rule for a special work setting. It does not defeat every claim after a dog bite.

Read the actual decision

Priebe v. Nelson — full opinion ↗

Legal review is recorded above.

Questions this decision helps explain

Court decisions have distinct facts. Read the opinion and the qualifications in each guide before applying a rule to a different situation.

WHEN YOU NEED A PERSON, NOT ANOTHER PAGE

Your situation deserves
a closer look.

A guide can explain a rule. A lawyer can help you understand how it may apply to you.

Ask GJEL about your situation