California Injury LawExplained.Talk to GJEL
Court decision

DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.

Supreme Court of California · 1992
2 Cal.4th 593, pp. 600–604

ATTORNEY REVIEWED

Reviewed by Andrew (Andy) R. Gillin

California State Bar #45226 ↗ · Approval recorded November 4, 2026

How we record review approval

What the court decided

Each defendant’s share of noneconomic harm was tied to its share of fault. That type of harm includes pain.

Where the rule has limits

Financial losses follow different rules. The case also involved an employer that could not be sued for the same harm.

Read the actual decision

DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc. — full opinion ↗

Legal review is recorded above.

Questions this decision helps explain

Court decisions have distinct facts. Read the opinion and the qualifications in each guide before applying a rule to a different situation.

WHEN YOU NEED A PERSON, NOT ANOTHER PAGE

Your situation deserves
a closer look.

A guide can explain a rule. A lawyer can help you understand how it may apply to you.

Ask GJEL about your situation