Corenbaum v. Lampkin
California Court of Appeal · 2013
215 Cal.App.4th 1308, slip op., pp. 3–4
ATTORNEY REVIEWED
Reviewed by Andrew (Andy) R. Gillin
California State Bar #45226 ↗ · Approval recorded November 4, 2026
How we record review approvalWhat the court decided
The court rejected using full billed amounts from the care at issue as proof of other losses. The bills were subject to insurance discounts.
Where the rule has limits
This does not bar proof of all future care or pain. Those losses need an appropriate factual basis.
Read the actual decision
Corenbaum v. Lampkin — full opinion ↗
Legal review is recorded above.
Questions this decision helps explain
Court decisions have distinct facts. Read the opinion and the qualifications in each guide before applying a rule to a different situation.